| ID | Kind | Severity | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| claim-001 | claim | medium | A Decision Receipt is a five-layer cryptographic proof comprising a sealed evidence bundle, policy enforcement record, competing hypotheses, Ed25519 signature, and deterministic replay capability. |
| claim-002 | claim | medium | The evidence bundle is sealed at decision time, capturing the actual inputs the system considered — not a reconstruction or log entry generated after the fact. |
| claim-003 | claim | medium | Deny-by-default policy enforcement means no decision proceeds without a documented policy evaluation, and the receipt records competing hypotheses that were considered alongside the selected outcome. |
| claim-005 | claim | medium | Deterministic replay transforms a Decision Receipt from a record of what happened into a reproducible proof — the critical distinction between accountability claims and accountability evidence. |
| editorial-risk-1 | editorial | medium | Do not reproduce internal receipt schema or field names — use public abstract language only. |
| editorial-risk-2 | editorial | medium | Patent-sensitive material: reference architecture from public abstract, do not expose implementation details. |
| editorial-risk-3 | editorial | medium | The Ed25519 choice is a design decision, not a proprietary innovation — frame accordingly. |
| editorial-risk-4 | editorial | medium | Competing hypotheses concept is patent-sensitive — describe the what, not the how. |
| Claim | Risk | Status | Evidence | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A Decision Receipt is a five-layer cryptographic proof comprising a sealed evide… | medium | approved | 1 | 1 |
| The evidence bundle is sealed at decision time, capturing the actual inputs the … | medium | approved | 2 | 2 |
| Deny-by-default policy enforcement means no decision proceeds without a document… | medium | approved | 1 | 1 |
| Ed25519 cryptographic signatures enable any party with the public key to indepen… | low | approved | 2 | 2 |
| Deterministic replay transforms a Decision Receipt from a record of what happene… | medium | approved | 2 | 2 |
| ID | Status | License | Constraints |
|---|---|---|---|
| rights-public-record | public_domain | U.S. Government work / public record / public standards | — |
| rights-internal-analysis | cleared | Summit Cognitive internal — cleared for publication | Frame as conceptual analysis, not implementation details |
| rights-internal-data | cleared | Summit Cognitive production data — cleared for publication | Verify metrics against live endpoint before publication |
| rights-patent-public | cleared | USPTO public filing — reference only | Reference public abstract only, Do not reproduce patent-sensitive internals, Do not expose internal schema or field names |
| Profile | Provider | Consent | Safety Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| voice-host | local_tts | not_required | Synthetic voice, no human consent required. |
| voice-narrator | local_tts | not_required | Synthetic voice for scene transitions. |
| From | → | To | Relationship |
|---|---|---|---|
| source-receipt-anatomy | → | evidence-receipt-architecture | supports evidence record |
| source-crypto-primer | → | evidence-ed25519-properties | supports evidence record |
| source-replay-concept | → | evidence-replay-vs-logs | supports evidence record |
| source-nist-ai-rmf | → | evidence-nist-mapping | supports evidence record |
| source-competitive-landscape | → | evidence-competitive-context | supports evidence record |
| evidence-receipt-architecture | → | claim-001 | substantiates claim |
| evidence-receipt-architecture | → | claim-002 | substantiates claim |
| evidence-replay-vs-logs | → | claim-002 | substantiates claim |
| evidence-receipt-architecture | → | claim-003 | substantiates claim |
| evidence-ed25519-properties | → | claim-004 | substantiates claim |
| evidence-replay-vs-logs | → | claim-004 | substantiates claim |
| evidence-replay-vs-logs | → | claim-005 | substantiates claim |
| evidence-nist-mapping | → | claim-005 | substantiates claim |
| evidence-receipt-architecture | → | line-001 | grounds narration line |
| evidence-receipt-architecture | → | line-002 | grounds narration line |
| evidence-replay-vs-logs | → | line-002 | grounds narration line |
| evidence-receipt-architecture | → | line-003 | grounds narration line |
| evidence-receipt-architecture | → | line-004 | grounds narration line |
| evidence-ed25519-properties | → | line-005 | grounds narration line |
| evidence-receipt-architecture | → | line-005 | grounds narration line |
| evidence-replay-vs-logs | → | line-006 | grounds narration line |
| evidence-nist-mapping | → | line-007 | grounds narration line |
| evidence-competitive-context | → | line-007 | grounds narration line |
| source-receipt-anatomy | → | asset-receipt-anatomy | materializes source into asset |
| prov-source-collection | → | asset-receipt-anatomy | records asset provenance |
| source-crypto-primer | → | asset-crypto-primer | materializes source into asset |
| prov-source-collection | → | asset-crypto-primer | records asset provenance |
| source-replay-concept | → | asset-replay-concept | materializes source into asset |
| prov-source-collection | → | asset-replay-concept | records asset provenance |
| source-nist-ai-rmf | → | prov-source-collection | input to provenance action |
| source-competitive-landscape | → | prov-source-collection | input to provenance action |
| source-receipt-anatomy | → | prov-source-collection | input to provenance action |
| source-crypto-primer | → | prov-source-collection | input to provenance action |
| source-replay-concept | → | prov-source-collection | input to provenance action |
| prov-source-collection | → | asset-receipt-anatomy | output of provenance action |
| prov-source-collection | → | asset-crypto-primer | output of provenance action |
| prov-source-collection | → | asset-replay-concept | output of provenance action |
| asset-receipt-anatomy | → | prov-manifest-assembly | input to provenance action |
| asset-crypto-primer | → | prov-manifest-assembly | input to provenance action |
| asset-replay-concept | → | prov-manifest-assembly | input to provenance action |
| episode-plan | → | out-podcast | required by output target |
| evidence-ledger | → | out-podcast | required by output target |
| rights-ledger | → | out-podcast | required by output target |
| out-podcast | → | dist-rss | routes to distribution target |
| out-podcast | → | dist-archive | routes to distribution target |
| episode-plan | → | out-trailer | required by output target |
| evidence-ledger | → | out-trailer | required by output target |
| rights-ledger | → | out-trailer | required by output target |
| out-trailer | → | dist-youtube | routes to distribution target |
| episode-plan | → | out-short-clip | required by output target |
| … and 25 more edges | |||
Premise: Episode 1 established the accountability gap. Now we open the box. A Decision Receipt is not a log entry or a dashboard metric — it is a five-layer cryptographic proof. This episode dissects each layer: the sealed evidence bundle, the deny-by-default policy enforcement record, the competing hypotheses, the Ed25519 signature, and the deterministic replay capability that transforms a record into a proof.
Audience Promise: By the end of this episode, you will understand exactly what is inside a Decision Receipt, why each layer exists, and how deterministic replay turns an accountability claim into an independently verifiable proof — all without exposing patent-sensitive internals.
Call to Action: Check the source appendix for the cryptographic verification primer and deterministic replay concept paper, then visit decrec.summitcognitive.ai to verify a real receipt yourself.
| # | Title | Purpose | Duration | Claims |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cold open: opening the box | Present a Decision Receipt as a tangible artifact and set up the five-layer dissection. | 60s | 1 |
| 2 | Layer 1: The sealed evidence bundle | Explain what the evidence bundle contains and why sealing at decision time matters. | 180s | 1 |
| 3 | Layer 2: Deny-by-default policy enforcement | Show that every decision must pass policy evaluation and the outcome is recorded. | 150s | 2 |
| 4 | Layer 3: Competing hypotheses | Explain why recording alternatives considered is essential to accountability. | 150s | 1 |
| 5 | Layer 4: Ed25519 cryptographic signature | Demonstrate how the signature enables independent verification. | 150s | 1 |
| 6 | Layer 5: Deterministic replay | The critical distinction — replay transforms a record into a proof. | 200s | 2 |
| 7 | Close: a proof, not a claim | Synthesize the five layers and preview Episode 3. | 60s | 0 |
| ID | Format | Audience | Render Target | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| out-podcast | podcast_episode | core Summit audience | generated/podcast_episode.json |
dist-rss, dist-archive |
| out-trailer | trailer | discovery audience | generated/trailer.json |
dist-youtube |
| out-short-clip | short_clip | discovery audience | generated/short_clip.json |
dist-youtube |
| out-youtube-chapters | youtube_chapters | core Summit audience | generated/youtube_chapters.json |
dist-youtube |
| out-transcript | transcript | core Summit audience | generated/transcript.json |
dist-static, dist-archive |
| out-newsletter | newsletter_issue | core Summit audience | generated/newsletter_issue.json |
dist-newsletter |
| out-show-notes | show_notes | core Summit audience | generated/show_notes.json |
dist-static |
| out-source-appendix | source_appendix | core Summit audience | generated/source_appendix.json |
dist-static, dist-github |